[address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Milton L Mueller
mueller at syr.edu
Mon Jun 4 20:27:23 CEST 2012
Dan: Monthly was a kind of default modeled on the ARIN policy and for minimizing the administrative burden, but there was nothing magical about the interval. If people think a more rapid interval is needed, I would not object. --MM > -----Original Message----- > From: address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg- > bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Dan Luedtke > Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 1:45 PM > To: address-policy-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-05 New Policy > Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers) > > > The list will be updated monthly > In periods of heavy transfers, this might be a little to slow. > Is weekly an option? Does it create more work for RIPE NCC or will the > list be auto-generated anyway? Can someone in favor of monthly updates > clarify why monthly was chosen? > > Regards > Dan > -- > Dan Luedtke > http://www.danrl.de
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] [policy-announce] 2012-05 New Policy Proposal (Transparency in Address Block Transfers)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]