[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] revisit additional allocation policy (was: 2011-04 New Draft Document Published)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Thu Feb 16 09:57:50 CET 2012
On 2/16/12 1:12 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:20:18PM +0100, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: >>> The problem is that the "additional allocation" policy is far more >>> draconian than the "initial allocation" policy. >>> >>> HD ratio doesn't matter for the initial alloc, but for any >>> additional alloc. >> >> What I read here is that probably we'll have to revise additional alloc >> policy part when we are done with 2011-04, am I right? > > Yesterday. I see 2011-04 more as a vehicle to buy us three more bits to > fix the additional allocation policy mess hopefully in time before folks > need more than a /29, and that's why I don't oppose it. :-) +1 Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] revisit additional allocation policy (was: 2011-04 New Draft Document Published)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]