[address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tiberiu Ungureanu
tbb at ines.ro
Wed Feb 15 16:47:59 CET 2012
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 16:32 +0100, Michael Adams wrote: > 5.1.2 says it's possible to qualify for an initial allocation greater > than /29 based on the number of existing users. > > Shouldn't this be possible for existing IPv6 space holders too? > 5.7 doesn't mention this. Existing IPv6 space holders can request (under the new policy) space to get them to /29. Should they NEED more, based on their existing users, they would probably qualify to request additional space. If they don't qualify to request additional space, do they really NEED more? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20120215/b02bf789/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Draft Document Published (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]