[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Wed Sep 28 17:13:59 CEST 2011
On 28/09/2011 15:45, Turchanyi Geza wrote: > 1, If the number of IPv6 PI slots allocated reaches a certain level then > the policy should be immediatly reviewed; The number of the IPv6 PI slots > allocated must not exceed the numbers of the LIRs in the regions; however, > a lower limit would be also fine for me. I don't think there is a requirement to force a review at a particular number of registrations. Géza, if you disagree with this, there is nothing to stop you from submitting a new policy proposal when the number of ipv6 pi registrations reaches whatever level you believe is sufficient. > 2, The policy should include the warning that ISPs might filter off the > announcements of small sized slots from their routing table. This is already in the policy: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-523#routability Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2011-02 moving to Last Call
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]