[address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Tue Nov 15 10:49:09 CET 2011
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 08:59:35AM +0100, Jan Zorz @ go6.si wrote: > Broadcom revealed that in new chipset for CPE IPv6 and 6RD are HW > accelerated. Major vendors are offering 6RD core boxes and many operators > are testing them. Let's do that properly, if it's unavoidable. 6RD is not > the best mechanism ever invented, but making it more complicated and > expensive with multiple-6rd-domains because of lack of IPv6 space makes > operational life even more complicated. "properly" as in "easy to deploy" would be to have an extra, eventually temporary, separate /24 for 6RD. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04, "Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]