[address-policy-wg] 6rd as technology that might have an impact to HD ratio

On 05.11.11 12:37, "Jan Zorz @ go6.si" <jan at go6.si> wrote:


>1. If you filled up the whole /30, then you should probably not be
>running 6RD anymore, get rid of it and use that space for native
>2. If you filled up /30 and can't get rid of 6RD, evaluate again you
>addressing plan sanity :)
>3. If nothing of the above does apply, you are probably so big you
>should get more than /29 as initial allocation anyway
>4. What else can possibly go wrong?

+1

>So, 6RD should not be treated as anything special, as it is not a part
>of modified text in the policy, therefore if you are running 6RD, you
>still need to show the number of sites that you are covering with IPv6
>PD and this has really nothing to do with 2011-04 proposal (but I can
>see new HD ratio discussion in the horizon :) )

Agreed, one must just follow the already existing policies with regards to
assignment-size in the object, so this will not change anything in that
respect either.

I cannot see any reason for this proposal not to move forward. AFAIK,
there are no other policies that needs to be changes.

Regards
Ragnar