[address-policy-wg] concept document: IPv6 PA/PI unification
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dan Luedtke
maildanrl at googlemail.com
Tue Nov 1 17:32:01 CET 2011
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > o oh, dtag wants another /2, yep they eat them regularly, and we just > do not have the depth to look deeply into their net design. fine > > o this weenie that wants a /48, who the heck are they and have they > any net design That's how I felt like it is now, so it cannot get worse. The most important point for me is, that larger blocks will be more expensive than the small (/48) ones. If the costs are shared equally, the "weenies" pay the org overhead for LIRs. Gerts 50/100/200 EUR plan is the way to go. just my 2 cents. regards, danrl -- regards. danrl -- Dan Luedtke http://www.danrl.de
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-05 New Policy Proposal (Safeguarding future IXPs with IPv4 space)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-04 New Policy Proposal (Extension of the Minimum Size for IPv6 Initial Allocation)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]