[address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Mon May 2 16:55:15 CEST 2011
You wrote: > If you give your customers a single /128, you're forcing *them* to use NAT. This is bad. And they wouldn't be able to use stateless auto-configuration or RFC 3041 privacy extensions. > > Probably the simplest way will be subnet /64 or smaller, where part of > > IP will be MAC address of enduser. > > The strong recommendation is to give your customers something between a /48 and a /64. > NO LESS, unless you know for sure(!) that they only have a single machine, and no network > behind it. Even if they only have one machine there are advantages to assigning at least a /64. Regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] getting second IPv6 PA as a LIR
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]