[address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-08
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-08
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Milton L Mueller
mueller at syr.edu
Thu Jul 28 17:39:49 CEST 2011
Jim: > -----Original Message----- > We're in a paradox where the > community has killed a policy on address certification while > simultaneously authorising the NCC to develop such a system. [snip] > There now needs to be a vote by the NCC membership to > take a decision which will normalise that situation. And unlike RIPE's > PDP, the AGM shouldn't take 3 years to decide. If the NCC membership votes to continue developing the system, how exactly does the situation get "normalized?" A vote to continue development of a system that has been rejected in the policy process continues the paradox, does it not? Only a negative vote would normalize. And I don't get the impression that you would vote no, or urge others to vote no. Milton L. Mueller Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies Internet Governance Project http://blog.internetgovernance.org
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-08
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]