[address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-09
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-09
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-09
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Thu Jul 28 02:54:49 CEST 2011
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 01:15:01AM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: >Well IMO, any debate lasting *that* long cannot be called "proper". A >more honest description might be "ivory-towered" or "defective". There >is something fundamentally wrong if we can't get a policy done in 3 >years(!) and then have what appeared to be a consensus come off the >rails at the very last moment. We, the RIPE community, should hang our >heads in shame. Imagine the derision we'd rightly heap on other policy- >making bodies if they had produced this outcome. And we all know a few >of them. I have to agree with that but IMO it is because, with some proposals, a long time passes between any updates/any movement and people simply forget about them - after all, very few do policy development as a full-time job... Maybe it would be worthwile discussing ways to keep the PDP flowing more smoothly -unless, of course, it becomes irrelevant, cf my post above. rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-09
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] the post-mortem on 2008-09
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]