[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Jul 19 11:40:09 CEST 2011
Hi, > On 7/19/11 11:16 AM, Ahmed Abu-Abed wrote: >> I think we will keep having having these issues until the minimum subnet >> assignment (outside point to point links) can be smaller than /64 which >> is an astronomical waste of public addresses for a home or business >> assignment. > > Maybe it's me, but I really don't understand what are you talking about. > Can you please elaborate a bit on this? Please take this off-list as this is out of scope for RIPE. Thanks :) Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]