[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Jul 19 11:32:39 CEST 2011
Hi Gunter, > GV> An issue I see with this policy is that it does not support > pro-active address planning for the longer term and may end up in > fragmented non-summarizable address space within an organization. Mainly > because the newly required address space will be different block and > will as result require new address planning policy within the > organization itself. I don't understand your comment. The idea of the policy proposal is to automatically grow the existing /32 to a /29. That results in a single /29 for an ISP. - Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]