[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question - Not for ISP but hosting
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question - Not for ISP but hosting
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: IPv6 PI resource question - Not for ISP but hosting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Feb 15 20:34:47 CET 2011
Hi, > Would you agree with me that in this scenario the use of pi space is warranted yet strictly speaking not allowed under the current policy? I don't know if this is a waranted use of PI space. The problem here is that the extra route has a global cost for everyone. This would not be neccesary if you make sure that you can easilly renumber in the future. Playing devil's advocate: why should everyone pay so that you don't have to invest in better device management? So I do understand your problem, but I don't know what the best sollution is... Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question - Not for ISP but hosting
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: IPv6 PI resource question - Not for ISP but hosting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]