[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon Feb 14 23:26:29 CET 2011
Hi Mark, > Another option (but that isn't something for > this list I guess) is to have some LIR extra light account with just 1 IPv6 > range and for more you need to become a normal LIR, an extra limitation > could be that it would be required that you've some IPv4 PI space. This might be a valid option, but indeed not as something for this list but as something for the RIPE NCC GM. I do get the impression here that the current policy (Get a /32 or larger PA for providing access service to customers, or get a /48 PI as a multi homed end-user) is not 'wrong', but that people have problems with the cost of running an LIR. If this is the case I am not sure if we should start changing the policy... - Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]