[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] consensus and 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Fri Dec 9 11:49:01 CET 2011
On 09/12/2011 09:47, Immo 'FaUl' Wehrenberg wrote: > I personally am not sure wether we have "group solidarity of belief or > sentiment" here, and I don't think we can declare it without Geza agreeing. > > To be clear here: that does not meen that Geza must agree on the proposal > or withdraw his objections. I only ask wether he considers the groups belief > and sentiment on accepting the proposal solidary. Immo, You're arguing that the person who shouts loudest should have a veto. This is not consensus, and is not how APWG operates. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] consensus and 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]