AW: [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Marcus.Gerdon Marcus.Gerdon at versatel.de
Tue Apr 19 09:10:03 CEST 2011

Michiel,

> Not everything on the internet is a bussiness with needs and 
> a large bag of 
> cash. Please also consider the non-profit organisations with 
> valid reasons 
> of running their own PI network.

I'd be quite interested in hearing/reading your thoughts about the
'valid reasons' you see.

I currently can't think of any non-multihoming PI requirement in
establishing internet access for enterprises (and non-profits / ngo are
alike in the meanwhile) that validate driving additional cost for every
network to support their PI without technical need.


kind regards,

Marcus

• Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
• Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ address-policy-wg Archives ]