[address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Wed Nov 24 02:12:40 CET 2010
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:43:54PM +0000, James Blessing wrote: > How about > > ripe-wg- > > Where WG is replaced with the initial WG short code (so WG in this > list would be ap and the final ref would look like ripe-ap-2010-9999) Where is the added value of encoding a WG in the identifier? The PDP is cross-WG anyway so why introduce semantics in the proposal ID? Especially in the light of proposals touching multiple WG. I would suggest the prefix $RIR-PDP-$year-$number, e.g. RIPE-PDP-2010-4711 PDP for Policy Development Process, a term universally used by all RIRs. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]