[address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Wed May 5 17:43:35 CEST 2010
(HTML email is evil) On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 17:08, Jamie Stallwood <Jamie.Stallwood at imerja.com> wrote: > [de-lurk] Are split-location delegations any different / more evil than TE'd > or distinct-routed subnets? I can't see where this is going. I can't see why a geographical distinction would make sense, either. At the very least, you are excluding anyone who is split into two buildings for redundancy and I did not think about this for more than a few seconds. RIchard
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]