Fwd: Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Previous message (by thread): Fwd: Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed Apr 14 11:12:30 CEST 2010
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 11:07 +0200, Axel Pawlik wrote: > On 14/04/2010 09:48, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > > I believe you are correct Carlos. (1.) would potentially move > > legacy IPv4 resource into the ARIN region from everywhere else > > in the world. (*) > > Just a clarification... > > As this is a global policy proposal, all RIR regions would have to > be in agreement for it to be implemented. In that case, yes, resources > returned to IANA would later be re-allocated, possibly to other > regions than they came from. But at least in an even handed way. > As things stand today, with the ARIN community having agreed > on a different text than the other RIRs' communities, this proposal > fails as a global policy; which means that it will not be implemented. Yes, I think I made this point clear in my original email. The policy, as a global policy, is doomed anyway. What I am trying to ascertain is how we tidy up the chairs and put the lights out in the RIPE region. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): Fwd: Re: [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy proposal 2009-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]