[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Sep 7 13:10:25 CEST 2009
On 6 Sep 2009, at 21:42, Nick Hilliard wrote: > In summary, I propose we drop 2008-06 and 2009-04, that we adopt > 2009-03 and that we come to realise that these endless discussions > on the assignment of the last iana /8 are not going anywhere. I could live with that. Though I'd be more than happy if discussions about what do with the last /8 continued until they didn't matter any more. :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]