[address-policy-wg] 2009-07 New Policy Proposal (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks (ASNs) to Regional Internet Registries)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-07 New Policy Proposal (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks (ASNs) to Regional Internet Registries)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Phase 2 Implementation: Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Sun May 31 08:43:57 CEST 2009
On 27 May 2009, at 15:48, Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Policy for Allocation of > ASN Blocks (ASNs) to Regional Internet Registries [...] > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2009-07.html Hi, Filiz, everyone -- I support this proposal. As somebody involved with spreading information about the operational problems that were discovered with several asn32 implementations, please could I make a few comments : - The time-extension should be to help mitigate effects of the first generation asn32 bgp code, not buy a solution to inertia. ASN32 is now broadly safe to plan and implement, so understand the issues that were uncovered last year and then please do roll out a safe implementation on your networks ! - Do we need an additional RIPE policy alongside this advisory, extending the asn16 space in the ripe region by some months or a year ? Kind regards, Andy Davidson
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-07 New Policy Proposal (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks (ASNs) to Regional Internet Registries)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Phase 2 Implementation: Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]