RIPE policies and routing, was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: RIPE policies and routing
- Next message (by thread): RIPE policies and routing, was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sat May 30 14:05:57 CEST 2009
Hi, On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 09:54:14AM +0100, David Freedman wrote: > (see 2006-05 for instance), perhaps we need some synchronisation with routing-wg here? We're right in the middle of this :-) The goal is (as has been presented in the Friday plenary at the last RIPE meeting) to get rid of the routing requirements in the address policy documents, *while at the same time* coming up with a good routing recommendation / requirements document from the routing WG. The routing WG already produced RIPE-399, which might already cover all our worries (need to re-read it myself). Gert Doering -- APWG chair -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645 SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: RIPE policies and routing
- Next message (by thread): RIPE policies and routing, was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]