[address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Anycasting for TLDs and ENUM
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Mon Jun 22 13:20:00 CEST 2009
> This of > course does not stop someone like ISC using a chunk of their > existing address space to provide anycast service for > dlv.isc.org (or whatever). IMO, it's up to the DLV > cheerleaders to make the case that their zones are > "important" enough to deserve special anycast allocations. Your example is essentially saying there is no barrier for a holder of an anycast address block, to offer more than one anycast service from that block. I think that address policy should be addressing that general case of an anycast network services provider rather than dealing with various special cases of applications that require anycast network services. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Anycasting for TLDs and ENUM
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]