[address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Lenz
slz at baycix.de
Fri Jul 17 10:12:40 CEST 2009
Hi Randy, Randy Bush schrieb: >> c) don't need NAT > > given > o ipv6 is address incompatible on the wire with ipv4 > o during the transition, if it happens, we want to keep one internet, > > how do you do this with out 4/6 nats? i'm sorry, as i tried to point out at the bottom of my the original response, this whole rant wasn't really meant 100% serious. Of course i'm aware that such things as 6to4 etc. might be called "NAT" too and might be needed indeed :-) It's just not the point of this thread, don't want to complicate it now. I think the more important thing is to show that there is little to no support for his specific approach (i hope). I just summed up some of my own point of views and exagerrated a little as a stylistic device. -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de = = Network Design & Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]