[address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Wed Apr 22 11:02:19 CEST 2009
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:27:01AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> Should critical DNS infrastructure include DLV zones for public use? > > > > $diety NO. > > Why not? How it is different from ENUM? > > -- > Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> DLV - as practiced by many - is a specific service offering by one vendor. ENUM on the other hand is a broadly defined/used service by many parties. I refer to Jim Reids posting for more reasons why DLV-specific policies by an RIR are short-sighted at best. --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]