[address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
B C
brettlists at gmail.com
Wed Apr 22 11:08:14 CEST 2009
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> wrote: > * Filiz Yilmaz: > >> The text of the policy proposal 2008-05, "Anycasting Assignments for >> TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM" has been revised. We have published the new >> version (version 3.0) today. The draft documents for the proposal >> have also been published, as well as the impact analysis that was >> conducted for this proposal. > > This proposal does not allow for a local/global node split. Is this a > problem? I don't think it is a problem I don't believe the policy should refer to any type/implementation of Anycast. > > Section 6.9 make it clear whether the prefix is per service or per > organization (that is, if an organization which runs multiple TLDs and > ENUM receives one, two, or many prefixes). I had already decided that this needed clarification and it has been done int he new version. > > Should critical DNS infrastructure include DLV zones for public use? > Definitley not DLV although it can be useful is a short term hack that hopefully will go away when the root (and some significant TLD's) is signed. Brett Carr
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 New Draft Documents Published (Anycasting Assignments for TLDs and Tier 0/1 ENUM)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]