[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jerzy Pawlus
Jerzy.Pawlus at cyf-kr.edu.pl
Fri Apr 17 12:28:57 CEST 2009
Marco wrote: [...] > > I find it less restrictive, administrative ease is allowed and you'll > always get a /32. > As you will always get a minimum allocation slot for IPv4. So you can't say it is less restrictive. The problem with /32 is that it is too big and 99% of LIR's will never approach to HD-Ratio. So in the future IPv6 table you will have a few thousand of PA prefixes and possible ten's of thousand PI prefixes. Certainly we can spare a few hundred additional PA prefixes for the new policy. Regards, Jurek
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]