[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu Apr 16 16:23:19 CEST 2009
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 04:18:34PM +0200, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > On 16 apr 2009, at 10:11, Jerzy Pawlus wrote: > > I think we can modify your idea slightly. Let's assign > > 10 'scoring units' for a second and subsequent /32 not fulfilling > >HD-Ratio. > > It will effectively move an LIR to a higher billing category. > > Let's not do that, as it would simply reduce the whole policy to you > get as much addresses as you can afford instead of you get the > addresses you need. Skipping HD-ratio in favor of scoring units is > bad, very bad. Which is what we have right now. Setup new (another) LIR (money). Get allocation. Merge LIRs (or not). Which is: "you get as much address as you can afford". Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]