[address-policy-wg] Draft Proposal: Assignment of an IPv4 /24 for documentation purposes
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft Proposal: Assignment of an IPv4 /24 for documentation purposes
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft Proposal: Assignment of an IPv4 /24 for documentation purposes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Apr 15 21:52:29 CEST 2009
Hello Peter, > For the DNS, RFC 2606 (BCP 32) has set aside several top level and > second level domain names and the network 192.0.2/24 has been > dedicated > for documentation and test purposes by the IANA in the past (see > RFC 3330). I am curious why the RIPE NCC is asked for this /24. If IANA has provided 192.0.2/24 in the past, why can't IANA provide another /24? It would require an RFC, but isn't that the right place to do this? Just trying to get all the background information :) Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft Proposal: Assignment of an IPv4 /24 for documentation purposes
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Draft Proposal: Assignment of an IPv4 /24 for documentation purposes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]