[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Wed Apr 15 18:02:06 CEST 2009
On 15/04/2009 2:34, "Marco Hogewoning" <marcoh at marcoh.net> wrote: [...] > Let's assume you have a seperate entity in your company, which > operates in a different geographical region under it's own AS and > routing policy. Only one company (the holding for instance) is an LIR > in the current situation. > > How do you solve this at the moment iin IPv4-land ? Good question. Isn't the normal answer to open a separate LIR for the separate business unit? Regards, Leo Vegoda
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]