[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Wed Apr 15 17:41:56 CEST 2009
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 03:51:41PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > - the current policy doesn't permit a single LIR to receive multiple > allocations (warning: an allocation can be bigger than a /32, so this > needs to be taken into account in the wording) I think this would be most easily solved by removing the condition that each /32 must be announced as such. In my opinion an "address allocation/ assignment" policy is not supposed to make routing decisions anyway.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]