[address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jakub Jermak
jakub.jermak at polsl.pl
Wed Apr 15 13:25:08 CEST 2009
Hello Remco, On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 05:36:09PM +0200, Remco van Mook wrote: > The 'unique routing policy' is already a requirement to get a second (or > any subsequent) AS as far as I know, so it doesn't really add any > limitation. Oh yes it does add limitation to a number of AS assigned by RIPE NCC to a given LIR. Recently I faced it. There has to be solid unique routing policy reason. Jakub Jermak -- - Jakub Jermak Silesian University of Technology - jermak at polsl.pl (JJ1214-RIPE) Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland - PGP: http://hydra.ck.polsl.pl/~jermak phone: +48 32 230-76-86
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [policy-announce] 2009-05 New Policy Proposal (Multiple IPv6 /32 Allocations for LIRs)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]