[address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tomas Hlavacek
tomas.hlavacek at elfove.cz
Fri Apr 10 01:35:29 CEST 2009
Greetings! As I quickly read it I think it brings a fairness to the End. And it is good thing. But can you/somebody estimate what this would cost us in the matter of deaggregation and what it can cost NCC in the increase of request rate? I mean is it likely or at least possible, that when you shorten those periods from 1y to 1/2y and put in place the 50% usage in the half of the period criterion, then the increase of request rate (and therefore new routes in DFZ) will be not two-times but say ten-times more? In fact my concern is the same as in a section "Arguments Opposing the Proposal". My question is how much would we "pay" for the fairness? Best regards, Tomas Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > attached you will find a policy proposal we call "Run Out Fairly". <cut> > PS: Can we refer to this proposal by name and not by number? ;-) > -- Tomáš Hlaváček <tomas.hlavacek at elfove.cz>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]