[address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Tue Apr 7 14:19:53 CEST 2009
On 07.04 14:16, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > > On 7 apr 2009, at 14:10, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > >On 07.04 13:14, Marco Hogewoning wrote: > >>Hi all, > >> > >>This seems indeed fair and I therefor support this proposal. I have > >>one question though, are there similair proposals out there in other > >>regions ? > > > >Not yet, although I have seen some discussion in the same general > >direction. Of course it would not be ideal if only one region > >eventually did this. But this cannot be a reason to do nothing. If > >it > >turns out that at one point in the future we have too widely varying > >policies in effect across the regions, we have to review the situation > >and then again make the trade-off between different kinds of fairness. > > > Agreed, we can't sit on our hands and wait. At the same time if the > other 4 regions take a different approach this might encourage people > to go shopping between RIR's. Yep. And we have to deal with that then. Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]