[address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Tue Apr 7 14:19:25 CEST 2009
On 07.04 14:02, Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > ... > > In ARIN, there is a proposal called "Depleted IPv4 reserves". > It is proposing to set a limit to be applied to all IPv4 address > requests when ARIN's reserve of unallocated IPv4 address space drops > below an equivalent of /9. By then, the address space that an > organisation can receive will be limited to a single /20 within a six > month period. > > This is currently under discussion and you can find further details at: > > https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2009_2.html While similar this appears to be a transition/new entrant reservation. It is orthogonal to "Run Out Fairly". > -o- > > In APNIC, they have discussed two proposals in their last meeting back > in February. One of them was to change the timeframe APNIC uses to > make IPv4 allocations to meet LIRs' needs from twelve months to six > months. The other was to set a maximum APNIC allocation size, by > gradually decrease the maximum allocation size based on the remaining > number of /8s in the IANA free pool. > > Both of these proposals were abandoned after APNIC 27, following a > lack of community support. > You can still find their details at: > > http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-063-v002.html > http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-070-v001.html These were the discussions I referred to. Note that one of the auhors of "Run Out Fairly" plays some role in the APNIC policy sig. ... > -o- > > LACNIC has reached consensus back in 2008 on a proposal called > "Special IPv4 Allocations/Assignments Reserved for New Members". > Accordingly when IANA's pool of IPv4 addresses is exhausted and LACNIC > has a /12 left in their pool, only new members will receive address > space from LACNIC. This space will be a /24 as the minimum and a /22 > as the maximum. They have further detailed criteria and you can see > them at: > > http://lacnic.net/documentos/politicas/LAC-2008-04-propuesta-en.pdf Again more of a transition/new entrant reservation.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Policy Proposal : "Run Out Fairly"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]