[address-policy-wg] Re: Revised 2007-01 set back to Review Phase (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Revised 2007-01 set back to Review Phase (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Revised 2007-01 set back to Review Phase (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Galbavy
peter.galbavy at knowtion.net
Wed Sep 17 12:57:47 CEST 2008
Florian Weimer wrote: > ... with PI, waste is at least visible). Once again, and again, and maybe one more time: Just because a PI prefix does not appear in *your* global routeing table does not mean it is not in active and valid use. PI prefixes do not have to be publicly published and there are very good reasons why not. Please read up on terms like VPN and INTERnets (my dumb emphasis). Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Revised 2007-01 set back to Review Phase (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Revised 2007-01 set back to Review Phase (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]