[address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Thu Oct 16 16:47:51 CEST 2008
On 15/10/2008 5:42, "michael.dillon at bt.com" <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote: >> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-06.html > > I wonder why this policy doesn't require the LIRs to have an > IPv6 allocation before they apply for one of the last few > IPv4 blocks? It might happen that ISPs in an area could provide customers adequate IPv6 space but not IPv4 space. In such a situation it might be necessary to get a block of IPv4 from the RIPE NCC but not be necessary to get a block of IPv6. It seems unreasonable to require people to take resources they do not want or need. Regards, Leo Vegoda
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2008-06 New Policy Proposal (Use of final /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]