[address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Fri Jun 13 14:23:57 CEST 2008
Hi Michael, > We cannot demand everyone participating in the consensus to reveal > their potential to benefit financially from the change, but I think > that it is reasonable to ask the "officials" to put their financial > position on the public record. You can always ask :) I personally don't mind giving information about my position. I am currently not working for an LIR. I have a share in Computel Standby BV, which has two /21s. These are both in use, and because /21 is the minimal allocation size those blocks can't be split up. This means that Computel can't transfer any address space, and my potential personal benefit is 0. Sander Steffann APWG co-chair
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Review Period extended until 9 July 2008 (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]