Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clive D.W. Feather
clive at demon.net
Tue Jul 15 13:04:09 CEST 2008
Randy Bush said: > of course the rules of 'contract' vary between cultures. and i am not a > lawyer. i am told that in the states, one does not need paper, it is an > exchange with an understanding. e.g. handshakes can be enforced if > shown to be unequivocal. True. However, at least in England, a contract requires "consideration". That is, each side must be giving something to the other. I have trouble seeing where that is in the case of an IP address allocation. I don't know whether US law recognises the concept or not. In Scotland consideration is not required, so the situation may be different. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive at demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 Internet Expert | Home: <clive at davros.org> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 THUS plc | |
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]