[address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey A. Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Mon Jul 14 02:36:19 CEST 2008
Sascha and all, Sure changing policies can be done on a daily basis. But what does that say for stability? Not much IMO. Setting a good long term policy is far better and again IMHO, necessary. Sascha Lenz wrote: > Hi altogether, > > Gert Doering schrieb: > > Hi APWG folks, > > > > this proposal keep being difficult for our processes. > > > > We got a rebound from the WG chair collective, because they felt that > > there was no explicit consensus for version *2* of the proposal, which had > > some signficant changes (inclusion of ERX in the text). > > > > Now this is v3, trying to work out the last wrinkles, and get it through > > the process properly, and we got *NO* comments on it. > > > > "No comments" does not mean "consensus". It means "nobody is interested, > > leave us alone with this". > > > > I think that this is a very important milestone, and it needs good backing > > by the community (or if you don't want it, it should be explicitely torn > > down). > > > > The main difference v2 -> v3 is that ERX space has been completely taken > > out [because RIPE has no legal basis to enforce anything - we'll come back > > to this with a new proposal], and that there is a *new* document that > > describes what to do with existing end-user assignments - which has exactly > > the same intent as v2, but we can't put requirements for existing assignments > > into a "new assignments" documents, so this needed cleaning up. > > > > So - please read the documents, as referenced in Ana's mail below, and then > > explicitely voice agreement or disagreement with 2007-01 v3. > > > > thanks, > [...] > > the PDP we have starts to annoy me over this proposal. > Very sad. > > My clear p.o.v., as private netizen, as consultant and as LIR still is: > > We need a contractual relationship in those cases we're talking about > here. So i still support this proposal - "2007-01 v3", even though i'm a > little unhappy about all the redesigns and the political debate around it. > > I still have one or two issues with the details, too (like we still > don't have actual NUMBERS as in $$$ etc.), but i'm not that self-centric > to stop the whole process about that. > If there's a problem, we can start again from there, AFTER THIS IS > FINALLY IMPLEMENTED. Policies can be CHANGED again guys... politicians > do it all the time... > > PLEASE go on with this, now. It's a start at least. > > -- > ======================================================================== > = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de = > = Network Design & Operations = > = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = > ======================================================================== Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]