Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Sat Jul 12 19:15:33 CEST 2008
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 09:54 -0700, David Conrad wrote: > On Jul 12, 2008, at 1:59 AM, Per Heldal wrote: > > Nothing prevents the RIR-community from > > changing the rules to reclaim un-announced space *if* there is > > consensus > > in support for such a move. > > I'm curious: un-announced to whom? That's a matter of definition. A definition that would have to be included in such a policy. For the RIPE region one could for example argue that a block that isn't visible to RIS in a given set of locations is not used publicly. //per
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]