Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Sat Jul 12 10:59:01 CEST 2008
On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 07:58 +0100, Peter Galbavy wrote: > If this space is reclaimed on the simplistic basis of "it wasn't in the > public routing table yesterday (or ever)" then reassigned, suddenly the > original assignee finds their private and confidetial traffic might > start leaking out one of their public connections. Great. You have a problem if security depends on your network resources not being announced to the outside. Nothing prevents the RIR-community from changing the rules to reclaim un-announced space *if* there is consensus in support for such a move. The legitimacy of private use of allocations is an important issue in that discussion. Poor network security, however, is no excuse. //per
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]