[address-policy-wg] Re: Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised2007-01...
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey A. Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Fri Jul 11 12:38:00 CEST 2008
Peter and all, Yep this is and will be a problem. So than they need to apply for additional private space again and hope it hasn't been put in other routing tables, or seek a different solution. FWIW, I can acquire plenty of IPv8 private space that I am very sure isn't in anyones public routing tables. Of course the price is VERY reasonable as well! >:) Routes great on any VPN as well... And amazingly enough those businesses won't have any ICANN, ASO, Ripe, ARIN, APNIC, of AFNIC worries to boot. >:) Additionally, encaptulates IPv4 public IP's and IPv6 IP's seamlessly. >:) With the passing of FISA, I'm getting quite a few new discrete inquiries... So all is not lost, just changing... Ya just can't stop progress, slow it down maybe, but never stop it... Peter Galbavy wrote: > Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Shane Kerr: > > > > > >> Fortunately there are no secrets in the routing table! So, it is easy > >> to see if any given space is being routed or not. > >> > >> The only time there is a problem is if revoked space is still being > >> routed by someone. > >> > > > > Some address space owners rely the uniqueness property. This applies to > > 3/8 and 9/8, for example, but I'm sure that it happens on a smaller > > scale, too. > > > > > > And, more importantly, PI space that is not publicly routed but must be > unique. On behalf of clients in the past I have applied for and had > assigned PI space for intra-organisational and/or VPN space. These > large, sometimes multinational, companies have public connectivity and > use private address space internally and where they need a VPN or secure > connection between themselves they do not want that in the public > routing tables but cannot use private space. > > If this space is reclaimed on the simplistic basis of "it wasn't in the > public routing table yesterday (or ever)" then reassigned, suddenly the > original assignee finds their private and confidetial traffic might > start leaking out one of their public connections. Great. > > Peter Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827
- Previous message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
- Next message (by thread): Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]