[address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Fri Jul 11 15:08:56 CEST 2008
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 04:58:41PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > > What would you propose the RIPE NCC do with revoked address space > > assignments? Should they just keep them in a "sin bin" or should > > they allocate or assign the address space to other network > > operators? > > sell them at a price high enough to pay for some extremely large > lawyer bills. Why would there be large lawyer bills? Wouldn't it be much, MUCH cheaper to simply sign a contract with the RIPE NCC saying "I am the assignee of this space" rather than spend money on laywers? -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01 moved back to Review Period (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]