[address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meeting network
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meeting network
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andreas Schachtner
andreas at schachtner.eu
Sat Dec 6 09:36:33 CET 2008
> On Dec 4, 2008, at 10:53 AM, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote: ... > > > > > > sure... any of these types of conferences -IN THE RIPE REGION- are > > going > > to need address space. they can all go get their own and pummel > > the routing > > system w/ adds/deletes as the come/go... > > You're aware, of course, that this would be so far down in the noise > in the routing flux that only the terminally pedantic would notice, > right? And, of course, announcing the same prefix from different origins causes just the same ... Regards, Andreas -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 233 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20081206/a8681056/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meeting network
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]