[address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Thu Dec 4 17:37:04 CET 2008
At 04:51 PM 04-12-08 +0100, Gert Doering wrote: >Hank complained that he did not receive the announcement mail. This does >not necessarily mean that "the people in the RIPE NCC made some mistakes". > > > Mistakes happen, but in order to fix them we need to understand > > exactly what it was that did happen and why it happened that way. > >I agree with this part... > > > The notices to the RIPE announcement list are irrelevant in this > > case. > >To the contrary. Mail gets lost due to SPAM filtering or other reasons >all day. Having Message-IDs enables people to figure out whether their >mailserver has indeed seen the e-mail (and delivered it somewhere or >dropped it), or not. Can someone from RIPE NCC make a test posting to the ncc-announcements list to see if I get it? Thanks, Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]