[address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Thu Dec 4 11:38:33 CET 2008
On 3 Dec 2008, at 10:48, Andrei Robachevsky wrote: > But meeting the "Contractual requirements" is more difficult, since > in a way that will require the RIPE NCC to have a contract with > ourselves and to evaluate our own request. Perhaps a more elegant > solution here would be the one proposed by Remco back in November > (to establish a policy that lets the NCC file a request in the > ordinary way). Does "The RIPE Community" exist as a legal entity ? Can the community hold the meeting resources and agree to hold a contract with the NCC ? Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]