[address-policy-wg] RE: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Mon May 14 16:14:17 CEST 2007
Just on a technical side-note... michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: [...] > Hopefully, the v6ops list will look at other alternatives such as using > AS numbers to define a block of addresses Are there enough bits to earmark for that, in a regime of 32bit AS numbers? > similar to the way GLOP > defined multicast addressing in RFC 3180 > http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3180.txt > > --Michael Dillon Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Can the RIRs bypass the IETF and do their own thing?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]