[address-policy-wg] PI (was: Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI (was: Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Mon Jun 18 18:13:39 CEST 2007
On 18 Jun 2007, at 17:09, Gert Doering wrote: > There is quite a number of people out there that are quite sceptic > about PI space - and really do not want to make access to PI space > easy and convenient. Consider me one of those - globally routed PI > space puts burden on everybody else, so this should be well- > considered, and putting some hurdles in people's way might make > them reconsider whether they really want PI or not. What, you'd rather people deagg their PA in order to let their customers multi-home ? > Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 113403 ... because it doesn't look like you prefer that at all ....
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ppml] Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI (was: Revising Centrally Assigned ULA draft)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]