[address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 August 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 August 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 August 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Roger Jorgensen
rogerj at jorgensen.no
Mon Jul 16 23:09:12 CEST 2007
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Gert Doering wrote: <snip> > > The reason for extending the discussion period is *specifically* to > see what will happen in the IETF, and then decide how to go ahead with > this proposal. If the IETF goes for "yes, ULA-C is a good thing", then > we can adapt this proposal accordingly - if they go for "ULA-C is not > going to happen! never ever!" Jordi can withdraw the proposal, and it > will be history. The point is that what are being discussed are quite different from what the current probposal ( http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-05.html ) says. It is probably that both the name, size and usage will probably be different. It is in short a quite different scenario. It will probably also outline a different assignment regime from the ULA-block too. -- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | - ROJO9-RIPE - RJ85P-NORID roger at jorgensen.no | - IPv6 is The Key! -------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 August 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 August 2007 (IPv6 ULA-Central)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]